Five questions, and among the most reliably scoreable in the paper. The content is definitional rather than analytical, which means the marks are available to anyone who has learned the distinctions precisely.
Objectives and benefits, and the difference between a rules based approach that specifies conduct and a principles based approach that sets outcomes and leaves firms to design controls. The syllabus also names ethical standards explicitly, which is a hint about how the framing questions are set.
The role of the main international regulatory bodies, and how their work is implemented at national level. The point being tested is the relationship between the two, not a list of acronyms.
Named as its own learning objective. Know what FATF does and what it does not do.
The main offences, the regulatory obligations they place on firms, the three stages, and client identity procedures. The stages are examinable as a sequence, so learn them in order and learn what each one is trying to achieve.
Two separate objectives in the syllabus, which is the strongest possible signal that the distinction matters.
A short revision checklist built from the official syllabus and from the explanations in our own question bank. Use it to check yourself after studying the chapter. It does not replace the official workbook, and it is not a prediction of what any exam will contain. Unfamiliar term? See the glossary.
The published examination specification allocates 5 of the 100 questions to this element. CISI notes the count may vary slightly between papers, so treat 5 as the weighting rather than a guarantee. Our bank holds 60 questions across the 7 learning objectives in this chapter, weighted to that same specification.
These are not predictions about any exam. They are places where the syllabus itself draws a line between two things that sound similar, which is where precise reading pays.
Spreading a false rumour to move a price is manipulation. Trading while holding material non-public information is insider dealing. Both are abuse; they are not the same offence, and questions routinely offer you the other one.
When a question lists several transactions, ignore the mechanics and ask what the person knew and whether the market knew it too.
Placement, layering and integration describe what the money is doing at each point. Questions describe a scenario and ask you to name the stage, so recognising the activity matters more than reciting the list.
A regulator that sets an outcome and lets each firm design its own controls is principles based, even if it also publishes detailed guidance.
Chapter 2 contains no calculation objectives. The syllabus phrases its objectives as know and understand, so the marks come from precision about definitions rather than arithmetic. The calculating lives mainly in Chapter 5.
Regulation rewards precision rather than reading time. Filter to this chapter and use the wrong answers rather than the right ones: if you picked insider dealing where the answer was market manipulation, the explanation tells you which part of the definition you slid past. That is a faster route to five reliable marks than re-reading the workbook chapter.
No card. The answer is only revealed once you have committed to one.
Start the free demo